If anything it just goes to show that even some of the greatest minds can be fooled by roulette.Įven Dostoevsky believed he could beat the roulette wheel by keeping his cool, although he didn't use an exact system during play. It just means they shared the same flawed belief that they could beat the inherent odds of the roulette wheel. Some of the creators of these systems are well-known mathematicians and politicians from the centuries ago:īut that doesn't mean their systems work. The systematic approach gives the illusion of being a framework for success, but ultimately they all provide the same results as betting random amounts at the roulette table. Whilst some appear to be more successful than others, over a long enough time period your losses will always converge toward the house edge.Īll these systems do is provide a different path to the same end result. To put it another way, you can expect to lose the same amount on average from each of these systems over the long haul. None of the systems above can actually help you to beat roulette, and they all provide the same results over the long run.
Negative progression systems are alluring, but they can lead you in to very dark holes. Note: If you're going to use a betting system, I would recommend using a positive progression system. A positive progression system tends to display a steady downward trend, with the occasional upswing from winning streaks.
